No. 18-154
Roderic Rooks v. Shawn Brewer, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fair-trial fifth-amendment franks-hearing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel newly-available-evidence pretrial-motion prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD GRANT CERTIORARI BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ERRED IN DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY TO PERMIT AN APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT'S REJECTION, ON A MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254, OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES FROM HIS STATE COURT CONVICTION.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying a certificate of appealability on petitioner's constitutional challenges to his state court conviction
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-24
Waiver of right of respondent Shawn Brewer, Warden to respond filed.
2017-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 4, 2018)
Attorneys
Roderic Rooks
Phillip Daniel Comorski — Petitioner
Shawn Brewer, Warden
Aaron David Lindstrom — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent