No. 18-1494
Michael Steven Beeman v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: counsel-performance criminal-procedure fourth-amendment guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-suppress plea-bargaining pre-trial-motion pre-trial-motions prejudice reasonable-counsel reasonable-performance
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether jurists of reason could debate that a district court must evaluate the merits of a potential motion to suppress where the defendant pled guilty to determine if counsel's pre-plea advice was reasonable and the defendant was prejudiced as a result?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether jurists of reason could debate that a district court must evaluate the merits of a potential motion to suppress where the defendant pled guilty to determine if counsel's pre-plea advice was reasonable and the defendant was prejudiced as a result?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael Steven Beeman
Jeremy Brian Gordon — Law Office of Jeremy Gordon, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent