No. 18-1481
Eric S. Strohmeyer v. Surface Transportation Board, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: abandonment administrative-law federal-agency-decision jurisdiction motion-to-dismiss rail-line-acquisition standing surface-transportation-board third-circuit transportation-board-jurisdiction united-states
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was it clear error for the Third Circuit to fail to address the issue of whether the Surface Transportation Board ("STB") had the jurisdiction to render a decision in the underlying proceeding? (Even if the court determines that Petitioner does not have standing.)
Were the allegations in Petitioner's Affidavit sufficient to defeat Respondents' Motion to Dismiss for lack of standing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Surface Transportation Board had jurisdiction to render a decision in the underlying proceeding
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent Surface Transportation Board, et al. to respond filed.
2019-03-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Eric Strohmeyer
Eric Strohmeyer — Petitioner
Surface Transportation Board, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent