No. 18-1469
Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. Casa de Maryland, et al.
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure-act agency-action agency-discretion deferred-action dhs-policy executive-discretion immigration immigration-enforcement immigration-law judicial-review policy-rescission standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental DueProcess FifthAmendment Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Environmental DueProcess FifthAmendment Securities Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether DHS's decision to wind down the DACA policy is judicially reviewable.
2. Whether DHS's decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether DHS's decision to wind down the DACA policy is judicially reviewable
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2019-07-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-10
Reply of petitioners Department of Homeland Security, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-06-24
Brief of respondents Casa de Maryland, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-06-24
Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.
2019-06-03
Motion to expedite consideration filed by petitioners DENIED.
2019-05-29
Response to motion to expedite from respondents Casa de Maryland, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-05-28
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)
2019-05-24
Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioners.
Attorneys
Casa de Maryland, et al.
John Arak Freedman — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLP, Respondent
Department of Homeland Security, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Immigration Reform Law Institute