I. Did the NH District Court abuse its discretion in
dismissing a proper Rehabilitation Act retaliation
claim, when it incorrectly claimed a "scoured" record
did not contain any evidence of protected conduct under the Rehabilitation Act, when in fact no less than
three instances of protected conduct existed?

II. By turning a blind eye to the Baylor standard re
deliberate indifference and failure to investigate Title
IX violations, did the NH District Court hold Petitioner
Isaacs to an incorrect standard when it required him
to demonstrate as a prerequisite that the harassment
occurred due to his sex, before holding Dartmouth accountable for not investigating an alleged assault?

III. Did the NH Board of Medicine violate Section
1983, and Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due
process rights, when it withheld key exonerating evidence from an evidentiary hearing that resulted in the
nationwide publication of a false Board reprimand?

Whether the NH District Court abused its discretion in dismissing a Rehabilitation Act retaliation claim, failing to hold Dartmouth accountable for deliberate indifference to a Title IX violation, and whether the NH Board of Medicine violated Petitioner's due process rights