1. Whether Petitioner was denied Due Process when the Respondents revoked his license by operation of law without adequate procedural protections, contrary to United States Supreme Court precedent?

2. Whether Petitioner was denied his Constitutionally-entitled fair notice about charges brought against him in the Respondents' administrative proceeding when the Board Members failed to provide notice of his license revocation hearing, contrary to United States Supreme Court precedent?

3. Whether Petitioner was denied Equal Protection as a Class of One when the Respondents repeatedly targeted and maliciously sought to revoke Petitioner's medical license without justification, despite contrary United States Supreme Court precedent?

4. Whether a Panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit erred in denying Petitioner's claims under the theory of issue preclusion, despite Supreme Court precedent that states issue preclusion does not apply when there was inadequate procedural due process in the first proceeding?

Whether petitioner was denied due process when respondents revoked his license without adequate procedural protections