No. 18-1400

E. V. v. Eugene H. Robinson, Jr., Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps, in His Capacity as Military Judge

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: article-6b due-process inferior-tribunals inferior-tribunals-clause judicial-review military-justice military-sexual-assault military-tribunals psychotherapist-privilege sovereign-immunity ucmj uniform-code-of-military-justice victims-rights
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

Congress gave certain rights to victims of military
sexual assault. 10 U.S.C. § 806b, Rights of Victims
("Article 6b"). Congress and the President gave victims
other rights, including the right to privilegedcommunications with psychotherapists.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 9 of the Constitution
gives Congress the power "To constitute Tribunalsinferior to the supreme Court" (the "Inferior TribunalsClause"). Congress constituted military trial andappellate tribunals by enacting the Uniform Code ofMilitary Justice. 10 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. ("UCMJ").
In violation of Article 6b and the psychotherapist
privilege, the Respondent military officer ordered theseizure and distribution of the privilegedpsychotherapy records of the Petitioner, a militarysexual assault victim. The military appellate tribunalssustained the Respondent's orders. Petitioner soughtjudicial review in federal courts established underArticle III of the Constitution.
Below, the Ninth Circuit held that the sovereign
immunity canon of construction precluded judicialreview in federal courts.
The questions presented are:
1. Whether Congress intended to bar judicial
review of a victim's rights under Article 6b; and
2. If Congress intended to bar judicial review,
whether such bar violates the Constitution's Inferior
Tribunals Clause.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Congress intended to bar judicial review of a victim's rights under Article 6b

Docket Entries

2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-22
Reply of petitioner E. V. filed. (Distributed)
2019-10-04
Brief of respondent Robinson, Eugene H. in opposition filed.
2019-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 4, 2019.
2019-08-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 5, 2019 to October 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 5, 2019.
2019-07-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 5, 2019 to September 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 5, 2019.
2019-06-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2019 to August 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 5, 2019.
2019-05-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 5, 2019 to July 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2019)
2019-03-26
Application (18A965) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 2, 2019.
2019-03-19
Application (18A965) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 2, 2019 to May 2, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

E. V.
Peter Jeffrey CootePennoni Associates Inc., Petitioner
Robinson, Eugene H.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent