No. 18-137
Ernest Hunter v. District of Columbia
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge constitutional-law dc-government due-process employment-dispute employment-rights free-speech government-agency government-employment personnel-rules retaliation whistleblower whistleblower-act whistleblower-protection
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the application of the relevant personnel rules of the District of Columbia, including the Abolishment and D.C. Whistleblowers Acts (DCWPA) by the District's Office of Employee of Appeals (OEA) and the District of Columbia's District Court and Circuit Court of Appeals, unconstitutional?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the application of the District of Columbia's personnel rules, including the Abolishment and DC Whistleblower Acts, by the District's Office of Employee Appeals and courts is unconstitutional
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
2018-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2018)
Attorneys
District of Columbia
Ernest Hunter
Ernest Hunter — Petitioner