Whether a veteran has a right to meaningful access to the courts and administrative agencies under the First Amendment of the Constitution when the government concealed evidence during adjudication, engaged in a continuing of pattern of systematic, deliberate fabrication of false statements and obstruction of justice, including, but not limited to, creating a false and fraudulent Board of Veterans Affairs (BVA) Decision based on fraudulently concealing material evidence this veteran had submitted timely appeal as uncovered by his FOIA request and terminating this veteran's appeal thereby completely foreclosing any further remedy, then published on petitioners official Veterans Affairs website for veterans (VA.gov).

Whether it is a violation of this veteran's First and Fifth Amendment rights when the VA and the District Court use the presumption of regularity and, or 38 U.S.C. § 511(a) non-review preclusion clause to ignore rebuttal evidence to defendants motion to dismiss (MTD), and to plaintiffs Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 12(b)1 OMTD and 60(b)3.

Whether a veteran has a constitutional right to a fair hearing on the merits of his disability claim decided according to fundamentally fair procedures and that the initial and subsequent determinations has been subject to nothing but deferential review that continues with the same concealed evidence during adjudication, misstatements of material facts, misstatements of law, fraudulent submissions and omissions.

Whether a veteran has a right to meaningful access to the courts and administrative agencies under the First Amendment when the government concealed evidence, engaged in a pattern of fabrication and obstruction of justice