1. When multiple police officers seek qualified immunity on a summary judgment motion, should their entitlement to qualified immunity be evaluated individually or collectively?

2. Did the court below act contrary to this Court's precedents by relying on a single inapposite precedent—its own—in determining that it was clearly established that business owners have a right to be free from retaliation directed toward their business by police officers after the owner complained to those police officers regarding their conduct?

When multiple police officers seek qualified immunity on a summary judgment motion, their entitlement to qualified immunity should be evaluated individually, not collectively