Should the order of the court of appeals denying a certificate of appealability be reversed and remanded, because it is manifestly incorrect to suggest that no reasonable jurist could disagree with a district court order summarily denying a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, where that order directly conflicts with the controlling decisions of this Court and the plain language of § 2255?

Should the order of the court of appeals denying a certificate of appealability be reversed and remanded, because it is manifestly incorrect to suggest that no reasonable jurist could disagree with a district court order summarily denying a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, where that order directly conflicts with the controlling decisions of this Court and the plain language of § 2255?