No. 18-1310
Charmaine Clement v. Thomas Durban, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: access-to-courts burden-on-access civil-procedure constitutional-law court-access discrimination equal-protection fundamental-rights non-resident-discrimination privileges-and-immunities privileges-and-immunities-clause residency-requirements standard-of-review state-courts
Latest Conference:
2019-05-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Article 85 is consistent with the Privileges and Immunities Clause despite its discrimination against nonresidents of New York and the material burden it creates on their access to New York's courts.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Article 85 is consistent with the Privileges and Immunities Clause despite its discrimination against nonresidents of New York and the material burden it creates on their access to New York's courts
Docket Entries
2019-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.
2019-04-25
Waiver of right of respondent Thomas Durban, et al. to respond filed.
2019-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 16, 2019)
2019-02-06
Application (18A803) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until April 15, 2019.
2019-01-31
Application (18A803) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 12, 2019 to April 13, 2019, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Attorneys
Charmaine Clement
Robert J. Tolchin — The Berkman Law Office, LLC, Petitioner
Thomas Durban, et al.
MacKenzie Fillow — Respondent