Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, or under what circumstances, a criminal defendant pursuing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is entitled to relief under a retroactive constitutional decision invalidating a federal statutory provision, where the record is silent as to whether the district court based its original judgment on that provision or another provision of the same statute.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant pursuing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is entitled to relief under a retroactive constitutional decision invalidating a federal statutory provision, where the record is silent as to whether the district court based its original judgment on that provision or another provision of the same statute
2019-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-07-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-24
Reply of petitioner Andrew Levert filed. (Distributed)
2019-07-05
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-05-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 5, 2019.
2019-05-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 5, 2019 to July 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-06
Response Requested. (Due June 5, 2019)
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 8, 2019)