No. 18-1254
Jeremiah L. King v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: child-pornography criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-facts fifth-amendment permissive-inference search-terms sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court of Appeals relied upon permissive inferences that violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment in finding Petitioner's conviction legally sufficient.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals relied upon permissive inferences that violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment in finding Petitioner's conviction legally sufficient
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Jeremiah King
Dustin Joseph Weisman — United States Air Force, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent