No. 18-1232
Al Zeiny v. United States, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process emotional-distress fbi-investigation federal-tort-claims-act free-speech government-misconduct intelligence-agency intelligence-agency-misconduct mental-health pro-se pro-se-litigant standing
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was the Court of appeals correct in ignoring the findings by the FBI and deny the substantiality of Zeiny's allegations?
Whether Zeiny's complaint satisfied the essential factual elements that would establish substantiality and cross the threshold of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)?
Was the court of appeals correct in denying Zeiny's motion to resubmit the petition after adding missing facts? Zeiny believes that these missing facts would have affected the outcome of the rehearing petition. Zeiny is pro se and suffers from schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type 2, and is expected to overlook important facts.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Zeiny's rights would prevail over the CIA's power
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2019-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Al Zeiny
Al Zeiny — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent