Whether the Rule 11 sanctions paid by petitioner for the alleged frivolous complaints from 2001 and yet unresolved, should be returned with interest according to judgment rate as of the date of the judgment for each sanction?

Whether the Estate of Suzanne C. Modlin, in her Last Will & Testament including Trust funds (UBS and Bank of the West accounts, death benefits, etc.) and all real and personal property naming petitioner, denied by Order of the Douglas County Nebraska Probate Court for alleged "breaking the law" was pretext, harassment, i.e. retaliation for the filing of alleged frivolous lawsuits, in the U. S. District Court - NE, should be returned with full transparency?

Whether Defendants named in official and or individual capacity and others yet unknown, be accountable for their unprofessional conduct, including unfair hiring, verifying as true, false information, or impeding investigations, causing loss of liberty of petitioner? [Unemployed for over 20 years] (Title 92, Nebraska Administrative Code, Chapters 27 and 28)

Whether Defendants, including Westside Schools, named in the various case files of Nicholas & Theresa Mrzlak, R & T Corporation, dba Country Club Inn Motel, Columbus Nebraska settle the "vintage" Court Order in favor of N.J. and Theresa Mrzlak R and T Corporation, dba Country Club Inn Motel, by returning land and financing rebuilding to present day standards, the facilities demolished in 2010, allowed by the coercion of vulnerable adults and as retaliation for the litigious behavior of petitioner? and retaliation for consults with Office of Discipline by both Mr. Mrzlak and petitioner.

Whether sale of family home of Nicholas and Theresa Mrzlak, 113 South Parkway, Columbus, Nebraska, be declared null and void; first [20081 sold after the Catholic Archdiocese attorney made false statements. followed by retaliation discrimination by realtor, Home Real Estate, advocating in [20151 for defendants Catholic Archdiocese of Omaha. (165 U.S. 578165 U.S. 578 (17 5.Ct. 427, 41 L.Ed. 832)

Whether petitioner should be made "whole again" by various defendants, using jury verdict research findings, with acknowledgment of repeated loss of income opportunity over a twenty plus year period, a constitutional right, by defamation, causing unemployment and real estate investment (including the old Carnegie Library, Columbus, NE) losses?

Whether the U.S. District Court of Nebraska and the Eighth Circuit erred or "covered up" wrong doing in refusing to recognize the serious nature of complaint [or the series of complaints] which addresses the harassment of Barbara Brundo in retaliation for years of "perceived" abuse of the judicial system which began in the same Court. This time the punishment injured yet another vulnerable adult by negating all of her estate plans under the pretense of Barbara Brundo abusing her fiduciary duties to her aunt. Ineffective counsel allowed it to happen as well as hastened judicial process and questions of conflict of interest, learned after the fact. The home of Suzanne Modlin was allowed to be raided and emptied and then sold in spite of the intent of her Will, which was never declared invalid and named petitioner Barbara Brundo as Successor Trustee.

Whether the U.S. District Court, of Nebraska and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, as a result of

Whether Rule 11 sanctions paid by petitioner for alleged frivolous complaints should be returned with interest