Does bankruptcy jurisdiction consistent of more than one type of jurisdiction, and if so, is one type of jurisdiction more dominate than all the other types of jurisdiction? United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S. 260 (2010); also see e.g., Davis v. Wakelee, 156 U.S. 680, 685-87 (1895) (Davis); also see, also see e.g., Bernards v. Johnson, 314 U.S. 19 (1941); Compare, BNSFRy. Co. v. Tyrell, 137 S.Ct. 1549, 1557 (2017).

Does any or mandate bind Courts exercising appellate jurisdiction to the previous and mandate, even if, multiple appeals are taken where any aspect of jurisdiction was erroneously decided, no jurisdictional analysis was made, or both, and if not, why not? Aria Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn, 563 U.S. 125 (2011) (Winn); also see e.g., Kuehner v. Dickinson & Co., 84 F.3d 316, 318-20 (91h Cir. 1996).

Does any question going to the jurisdiction in bankruptcy proceedings differ from the jurisdictional interpretations in any other type of proceedings, and if so, on what basis may the distinction be made? Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co., 282 U.S. 734, 73639 (1931); also see e.g., Union Stock Land Bank v. Byerly, 310 U.S. 1, 7 (1940); also see, Caiflin v. Houseman, 93 U.S. 130,133-34 (1876), affd, BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrell, 137 S.Ct. 1549, 1557 (2017); Compare, Waterman v. Cannal-Louisiana Bank, 215 U.S. 33, 44 (1909); also see e.g., United States v. Hudson, 11 U.S. 32, 33(1812); Ex Parte Rowland, 104 U.S. 604 (1882); Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. United States, 312 U.S. 502, 505-06, 508 (1941); also see, Cutler v. Rae, 48 U.S. 729, 731-32 (1849).

Does every interpretation rendered during the main bankruptcy proceeding, discrete issue in the larger bankruptcy proceeding, or both start from the premise the Pre-Code decisions of the United States Supreme Court govern all disputed questions that may occur during any bankruptcy proceeding? Emil v. Hanley, 318 U.S. 515, 521 (1943); also see e.g., Hamilton v. Lanning, 560 U. S. 505 (2010).

Does the most recent interpretation by the United States Supreme Court as to any bankruptcy amendment overrule every previous interpretation including Pre-Code interpretations by the United States Supreme Court? United States v. Estate of Romani, 523 U.S. 517, 531 (1998); Compare, Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp

Does bankruptcy jurisdiction consist of more than one type of jurisdiction, and if so, is one type of jurisdiction more dominant than all the other types of jurisdiction?