No. 18-122

Michael Sinegal v. Dawn Polk

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedRelisted (2)
Tags: 1st-amendment circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process employment-law employment-retaliation first-amendment free-speech political-candidacy qualified-immunity standing
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

County Commissioner Michael Sinegal terminated
Dawn Polk for being a bad employee. The terminationoccurred after she had unsuccessfully run for office forthe position of Precinct 8, Justice of the Peace. Polksued Commissioner Sinegal for terminating her inviolation of her First Amendment right to run foroffice. The trial court and the Fifth Circuit deniedSinegal qualified immunity holding, in opposition toother federal circuits, that candidacy alone is protectedby the First Amendment.

1. Whether candidacy for political office, standing
alone, is a protected right under the First Amendment.

2. Did the Fifth Circuit err in holding that Sinegal was
not entitled to qualified immunity when Fifth Circuitprecedent did not clearly establish that candidacy alonewas a protected First Amendment right until a yearafter Polk's termination?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether candidacy for political office, standing alone, is a protected right under the First Amendment

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-28
Reply of petitioner Michael Sinegal filed. (Distributed)
2018-11-14
Brief of respondent Dawn Polk in opposition filed.
2018-10-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2018.
2018-09-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2018 to November 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-14
Response Requested. (Due October 15, 2018)
2018-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)

Attorneys

Dawn Polk
Laurence W. Watts — Respondent
Michael Sinegal
Kathleen Marie KennedyJefferson County District Attorney's Office, Petitioner