Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the court of appeals violated this Honorable Court's "fundamental rule of judicial restraint" by failing to address whether Doris Freyre had standing to bring an associational ADA claim thereby properly invoking the jurisdiction of the district court and the court of appeals.
2. Whether HCSO, in conducting child protective investigations under a Grant Agreement with DCF on the State's behalf in accordance with Florida Statute §39.3065 acted as an "arm of the state" and is therefore entitled to Eleventh Amendment Immunity.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals violated this Honorable Court's 'fundamental rule of judicial restraint' by failing to address whether Doris Freyre had standing to bring an associational ADA claim
2019-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-09
Motion of the Solicitor General to extend the time to file a response from August 7, 2019 to September 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 6, 2019.
2019-08-07
Brief of respondent Doris Freyre in opposition filed.
2019-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 7, 2019.
2019-06-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 8, 2019 to August 7, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 8, 2019.
2019-05-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 6, 2019 to July 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-05-07
Response Requested. (Due June 6, 2019)
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2019)