No. 18-1194
Shane Crutchfield v. Jeff Dennison, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review martinez-trevino-exception post-conviction-review procedural-default state-court-proceedings trial-counsel trial-record
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the exception to procedural default established in Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. 413 (2013), is categorically inapplicable in Illinois.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the exception to procedural default established in Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. 413 (2018), is categorically inapplicable in Illinois
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent Jeff Dennison to respond filed.
2019-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Jeff Dennison
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Shane Crutchfield
Andrew Cadogan Lawrence — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner