1. When a defendant challenges the reliability of a
dog's reported alert to the possible presence of drugs in
a vehicle, in accordance with Florida v. Harris , 568
U.S. 237 (2013), and the trial court rules that the dog
reliably alerted, which suffices to establish probablecause to search the vehicle, what standard of appellate
review of the trial court's ruling that the dog reliablyalerted does the Fourth Amendment require?

2. Did the dog reliably alert to the possible
presence of drugs in the vehicle driven by Petitioner forpurposes of establishing probable cause to search thevehicle?

When a defendant challenges the reliability of a dog's reported alert to the possible presence of drugs in a vehicle, what standard of appellate review of the trial court's ruling that the dog reliably alerted does the Fourth Amendment require?