No. 18-1147

Deron Brunson v. L. Douglas Hogan, et al.

Lower Court: Utah
Docketed: 2019-03-05
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-disregard due-process equal-protection equitable-maxim fourteenth-amendment judicial-discretion object-principle-of-justice precedent precedent-contradiction precedent-interpretation standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

5. Whether the United States Supreme Court has set a precedence, under the doctrine of equitable maxim, that contradicts its own precedence's by freely giving broad discretion to a trial court to; 1) disregard the Fourteenth Amendment, and Articles III and VI to the United States Constitution, and 2) to disregards it's own State Constitution, which in this case would be Article 1 Section 7 & 11 to the Constitution of Utah, and 3) to disregard precedence's of any appeals court, which in this case would be The Utah Court of Appeals and The Supreme Court of the State of Utah, and the United States Supreme Court, and 4) to disregard The Object Principle of Justice. Under the doctrine of equitable maxim trial courts are the supreme law of the land.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the United States Supreme Court has set a precedence that contradicts its own precedence's

Docket Entries

2019-06-17
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-17
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-03-20
Waiver of right of respondents L. Douglas Hogan, et al. to respond filed.
2019-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 4, 2019)

Attorneys

Deron Brunson
Deron G. Brunson — Petitioner
L. Douglas Hogan, et al.
Nancy J. SylvesterAdministrative Office of the Courts, Respondent