No. 18-1113
Jeffrey Gray Thomas v. Laurie Zelon, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-complaint district-court-dismissal due-process federal-circuit-court federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-precedent rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine standing
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Err in Affirming the District Court's Dismissal of the federal civil rights complaint under the Rubric of Rooker-Feldman (Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. (1923) 263 U. S. 413 and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman (1983) 460 U.S, 462)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in affirming the dismissal of the federal civil rights complaint under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine
Docket Entries
2019-07-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-05-22
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent Hugh John Gibson to respond filed.
2019-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent Rosario Perry to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Hugh John Gibson
Raul Luis Martinez — Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Respondent
Jeffrey Gray Thomas
Jeffrey G. Thomas — Petitioner
Rosario Perry
Rosario Perry — Rosario Perry, A Professional Law Corporation, Respondent