No. 18-1108
Stephanie C. Stucky v. Dwight Takeno, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure civil-procedure collective-bargaining due-process labor-relations mootness prohibited-practice prohibited-practices voluntary-cessation
Key Terms:
Arbitration LaborRelations JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration LaborRelations JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Petitioner in this case receive due process
of law when the Respondent/Intervenor, Hawai'i Labor
Relations Board dismissed Petitioner's Prohibited
Practice Complaint on alleged grounds of being "moot"
because Respondents voluntarily ceased continued
violations of the subject Collective Bargaining Agreement only subsequent to Petitioner filing her Prohibited Practices Complaint before the Hawai'i Labor
Relations Board?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Petitioner did not receive due process when the Prohibited Practice Complaint was dismissed as moot, despite the respondents voluntarily ceasing violations after the complaint was filed
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-26
Waiver of right of respondents Dwight Takeno, Ray Camacho, Eric Nagamine, David Forrest, and Hawai'i State Teachers Association to respond filed.
2019-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent Hawaii Labor Relations Board to respond filed.
2019-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Dwight Takeno, Ray Camacho, Eric Nagamine, David Forrest, and Hawai'i State Teachers Association
Scott A. Kronland — Altshuler Berzon, LLP, Respondent
Hawaii Labor Relations Board
Stephanie Stucky, et al.
Shawn Anthony Luiz — Petitioner