No. 18-1056
Mitzi Johanknecht, Sheriff, King County, Washington v. Eva Moore, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eleventh-amendment ex-parte-young monell municipal-liability official-capacity prospective-relief section-1983 separation-of-powers standing state-court-orders
Latest Conference:
2019-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Ex parte Young establishes a novel and unprecedented judge-made cause of action, separate from § 1983, that can be used through an official capacity action to obtain prospective relief against a municipality whose local Sheriff faithfully executes facially valid state court orders.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Ex parte Young establishes a novel and unprecedented judge-made cause of action, separate from § 1983, that can be used through an official capacity action to obtain prospective relief against a municipality whose local Sheriff faithfully executes facially valid state court orders
Docket Entries
2019-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
2019-04-26
Reply of petitioner Mitzi Johanknecht filed. (Distributed)
2019-04-12
Brief of respondents Eva Moore, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-03-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 15, 2019.
2019-03-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 14, 2019 to April 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 14, 2019)
2018-12-27
Application (18A675) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 7, 2019.
2018-12-21
Application (18A675) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 8, 2019 to February 7, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Eva Moore
Elizabeth Anne Adams — TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC, Respondent
Toby J. Marshall — Terrell Marshall Law Group, PLLC, Respondent
Mitzi Johanknecht
David J. W. Hackett — Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Petitioner