No. 18-1026

William Kinney, et ux. v. Anderson Lumber Company, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: anti-trust antitrust-law-sherman-act concurrent-jurisdiction due-process due-process-clause equal-protection fourteenth-amendment religious-freedom religious-freedom-restoration-act sherman-antitrust-act unlicensed-practice-of-law
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether Tennessee's law for the unlicensed practice of law violates the Sherman Anti-Trust Act by restraining free market trade and competition without mandatory State oversight.

Whether Tennessee's law for the unlicensed practice of law is vague or over broad, depriving citizens of their rights without fair process, thus violating the due process clause and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Whether the application of Tennessee's UPL law by Federal Courts in concurrent jurisdictions violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S. Code § 2000bb.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Tennessee's law for the unlicensed practice of law violates the Sherman Anti-Trust Act and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2019)

Attorneys

William Kinney, et al.
William Kinney — Petitioner