I. Does Franks v. Delaware1 analysis apply when a court
opines information omitted from a warrant application
is material to establishing probable cause, and if so,
is omitted information evaluated differently than false statements an officer included in the warrant
application?

II. D id the warrant application Deputy Lenard Johnson
submitted inevitably violate clearly established law if
an appellate court opines 11 years later the affidavit
omitted information material to establishing probable
cause?

III. D id Richard Winfrey, Jr.'s claim brought under
Franks v. Delaware accrue when Winfrey was aware
of the factual content of information Deputy Johnson
is accused of falsely presenting in the warrant
application he submitted?

Franks v. Delaware analysis of omitted information material to probable cause