No. 18-1007

Assem A. Abulkhair v. Google LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights due-process email-privacy federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fourth-amendment judicial-recusal law-enforcement-overreach privacy-rights recusal religious-discrimination search-and-seizure search-warrant standing
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the District Judge has the authority to dismiss suit while his/her recusal remains pending and his/her disqualification and impartiality comes into question when and where the federal and state canon, statute and rule mandated otherwise?

Whether an email provider is authorized to provide a user's confidential "password" to any federal or state law enforcement agency to spy on him/her based on his/her religious faith, freedom of speech or national origin, and whether such an engagement of a malicious calculated conspiracy between both can hold them accountable and liable under the constitution with federal and state law?

Whether an unreasonable search seizure of an email property contains private information records executed without obtaining a search warrant or serving a proper notice violates the Fourth Amendment right by the Constitution of the United States?

Whether a corporation conversion modifies the caption of the grandfathered action?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Judge has the authority to dismiss suit while his/her recusal remains pending and his/her disqualification and impartiality comes into question when and where the federal and state canon, statute and rule mandated otherwise?

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-26
Waiver of right of respondents Google LLC, et al. to respond filed.
2018-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)

Attorneys

Assem A. Abulkhair
Assem A. Abulkhair — Petitioner
Google LLC, et al.
Jeffrey D. VanacorePerkins Coie LLP, Respondent