No. 18-1001
Casey Brandon Sibley v. Arizona
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-prosecution first-amendment free-speech overbreadth-vagueness strict-scrutiny subjective-intent true-threat
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the First Amendment requires proof of a speaker's subjective wrongful intent in order for speech to be deemed a "true threat" subject to criminal prosecution and conviction.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the First Amendment requires proof of a speaker's subjective wrongful intent in order for speech to be deemed a 'true threat' subject to criminal prosecution and conviction
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona to respond filed.
2019-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Arizona
Seth Peterson — City of Scottsdale Prosecution Division, Respondent
Casey Sibley
John Douglas Wilenchik — Wilenchik & Bartness, P.C., Petitioner